Archives for the ‘ART’ Category

MICHAEL LANDY’S ART BIN

I’m all for the celebration of failure, but celebrating waste is another matter.

Last year I started on an ambitious triptych, a painting made from a smooth, angled shards of wood, depicting a misty, ambiguous landscape, made from photographs of the lovely Peckham Rye common. I made the first piece, primed it, and experimented with some colours on it, then promptly abandoned the whole plan and started on something else.

Since then it has sat quietly in my studio, a non-entity, a third of a painting, never to be completed. So when I heard that Michael Landy was constructing an ‘art bin’ in the South London Gallery, right next door to my college studio, I knew my little failed painting had found its final calling.

Landy’s enormous glassy, classy skip fills the single roomed (though soon to be greatly expanded) SLG totally, acting as a very pleasing sculpture in itself. Steel frame and plexiglass windows rise from the ground in satisfying diagonals, and a grand staircase at the far end of the bin ends at the rim; it is from here that my painting is to be flung.

By the time I get to the gallery, the bin is already loaded with a mixture of stretchers, drawings in smashed frames, sculptures, casts and frabrics. Looking in I can pick out some things that are immediately recognisable. I catch the glinting print of a large crystal skull and littered on top are some scratchy prints, depicting crudely etched genitals and cryptic, lovelorn messages. Hirst and Emin are joined by, among others, Gary Hume, Landy himself and Julian Opie, who seems to have thrown out about half his studio.

Landy spends most of the time sat in the corner of the gallery, he alone has the power to judge what is allowed to be cast into the bin. I lean my painting against the wall, and ask if I can just throw it in. Landy takes a look at it and asks me to explain why it is a failure. I talk about its aborted brothers and he agrees that it I have indeed failed. It’s a strange experience and I can feel myself going red as I show him my work. I mean, I’m showing an artist I admire a shit painting I made, and he’s in accord that it is shit. Anyway, as we are both in agreement, in it goes. I climb up the stairs and from the top, the bin looks far emptier, a large pile directly below the drop off point, with the detritus petering out towards the other end. I pause and enjoy this view, and then throw mine in, where it makes a satisfying loud bang, and slides underneath one of Landy’s own framed drawings.

I don’t feel that great about it really. In fact I’m glad that my piece of crap is now partly obscured by Landy’s work, which is considerably less crap than mine. I’d imagined though that our experiences of tossing our work in would be very different. This is where Landy’s art bin gets problematic for me. While I was throwing a genuine piece of tut into the bin, Landy and the other famous, successful artists were throwing money away. There’s potentially hundreds of thousands of pounds wrapped up in Hirst, Emin and Opie’s rejected work. In this way, the bin to some extent proves artistic integrity, while also insulting younger, more struggling artists. There’s an arrogance to Hirst et al (obviously) casually throwing thousands of pounds into the bin, and for what real reason? To make themselves feel better? Maybe I’m missing the point, but imagine if all the money currently lying in the bin was given to charity instead. 100 yards from the gallery entrance lies Peckham town centre, not only one of the poorest and most dilapidated areas of London, but one filled with these aforementioned young, struggling artists. Imagine if these failed art works were put to good use, raising money for youth art projects in the area, or failing that, raising money for Oxfam, or a children’s home, anything. As someone with art world aspirations myself, and with the full knowledge that the likelihood of me throwing away prints worth thousands of pounds in the future is slim, I feel this is all a little insensitive.

Also, the age of the bloated London art market is most definitely over. The art world has been crippled by the recession just as everyone else has, and so Landy’s comment on the true worth of art is somewhat diluted. There’s people being made redundant every day in the UK, millions unemployed, and Hirst, Emin and Landy are publicly throwing away tens of thousands of pounds? They can fuck off. I’m not saying that these artists have an obligation to sell their work and give the money away, but such frivolous and public celebration of waste makes me sick. There’s a reason it’s frowned upon to go through people’s rubbish. What people throw away can be private, embarrassing and fantastically wasteful. Landy claims that in the bin, all the artists are equal, but for me and my fellow poor students graduating this year, this couldn’t be further from the truth.

Landy’s work just doesn’t seem relevant in this current artistic, and environmental climate. Just like his worldly possessions after his 2001 piece Break Down, all the art in the bin will end up in a landfill, with a few unbroken frames and stretchers being donated to Camberwell College of Art (thanks). Aren’t landfills full enough without artists purposefully adding to them? Granted much of this failed work may have ended up there eventually anyway, but surely there’s a more appropriate way of disposing of this stuff. Most of the work being either wood, paper or canvas anyway, I propose an enormous elaborate bonfire in Burgess Park, with Landy supplying free sparklers.

As I leave the gallery, I watch another Camberwell student, Samuel Craven, throw hundreds of pieces of A4 paper into the bin. Printed on each piece is photocopied fifty pound note. I don’t know the original intention of Sam’s work in this case, but it seems a fitting piece for the bin, showing what’s really in there, the money that could be used for something truly worthy.

I now regret throwing my painting in to Landy’s bin. What I throw away is my business, just as what Damien Hirst throws away is his. I’m in favor of admitting and (to an extent) celebrating failure, it’s a part of how all artists work. But really, I think we should all dispose of our waste in private.

By Tom Harrad

NEW CROSS FLY POSTER PROJECT

For Nail The Cross music festival. Poster designs by Off Modern, Patrick Barrett and Charlie Gibson.

- - - - - - - - - - -

ART MONTHLY: SPOTLIGHT ON AARON A. ANGELL

Aaron A. Angel is part of Deptford based Friendly Street Gallery, which is currently in the process of moving to a new location. As part of Friendly Street Gallery he exhibited and curated an exhibition with Off Modern as part of our week long South East in East festival, that happened way back in August. We thought we’d catch up with what he’s been up to since then as well as recap on his work form SEINE.

RELEASE, PART OF SOUTH EAST IN EAST, 12″ RECORD WITH HAND PAINTED SLEEVE AND ISSUE ONE TO FIVE OF VOTIVE ANCHOR.


UNTITLED. A DEPICTION OF BRITISH COLONIAL TROOPS DEFENDING A SCALE MODEL OF HENRY MOORE’S RECLINING FIGURE (LH 608), WHICH WAS STOLEN FROM THE GROUNDS OF THE HENRY MOORE FOUNDATION AND MELTED DOWN FOR SCRAP METAL IN CHINA.


MORE OF AARON A. ANGELL -

WEBSITE

MASSIVE WANKER (VOTIVE ANCHOR)

A NOTE ON ISAMU NOGUCHI’S PLAYGROUNDS

Architecture exists, or more correctly it is design to exist, which is why it is interesting when an architectural design is never realised and is instead left to float unsuspended through history. An exemplar of this is Vladimir Tatlin’s Monument to the Third International, which exists now as a monument to the constructivist theories of architecture and not to the Bolsheviks who commissioned it. By never being built it is denied one of the primary functions of architecture, to be a place, and yet neither is it a negation of place, non-place.

Architecture exists, or more correctly, it has different states of existence, it moves from realm to realm, from idea, to planning, to building, to completion, and then possible destruction, destruction can occur during any of these stages, and yet there is some fluidity between these states. We have renovation and rebuilding as well as destruction, we can resist the movements of time upon architecture. So what is interesting is when an architectural project never moves becomes anything more concrete than an idea, never passes from planning to building, and it instead becomes a symbol. This can also occur if a building is completely and irrevocably destroyed. There is a juxtaposition here, it is because architecture is a designed as a place for human interaction, architecture defines the way human beings feel, act and behave, and if an architectural project is never realised it can never play host to the exchanges that make up society. Never realised, it can only form part of a semiotic system that hints at these actions, it becomes part, not of architecture, but of philosophy.

When we consider this, in relation to the designs for the playgrounds Isamu Noguchi planned for outside the United Nations headquarters in New York, we must consider the planned type of human interaction that would occur there. For example, Tatlin’s Monument was planned to house Soviet government, Noguchi though, designed a playground, a place where one of the purest types of interaction occurs, play. Psychgeographry is concerned with how we live and how we want to live, but it is also concerned with how we ought to want to live, this rogue ought forms the basis of theories of psychogeography, especially in theories of urbanism. This will often focus on play, especially in the use of play to create new geographical contours for the city. Noguchi’s architectural playgrounds are the place designated for enjoyment, and all other spaces of enjoyment, from sporting arena to the cinema and the pub, follow on from the role play has in socialising young children in the playground. And because these playgrounds were never realised they themselves turn into the psychogeographical theories of how we ought to want to live.

Noguchi’s playground are not usual playgrounds, his approach is via the theories of urbanism, those that centre on the radical use of play and on the idea of maximising the spaces in a city designated for areas of play, by titling and angling the surfaces of his playgrounds they become part moonscape, part Dali’s draping clocks. Play is turned into a surreal activity, mythic in its ritualism, they are putting forward suppositions about how we should be socialised into functioning civilian adults from children, and yet they represent a sort of dystopian image of socialisation, it is Lord of the Flies as Modernist architecture not as allegory. Through their geographical location, next to the United Nations building, they are positioned as an area for the socialisation of future world leaders and so it predicts dystopian futures. It sits in the theoretical shadow of the United Nations organisation itself. The playgrounds aimed to pervert the way we ought to want to live through altering the environment that contains the early acts human interaction and socialisation; it twists our future, adult relationships into dystopia.

TASHA COX PHOTO SERIES

Here’s a preview of a photo poster series that will be fully exhibited at the 10th Off Modern, on December 3rd at Corsica Studios.

Tasha’s work is often both photographic and performance based, see some more of it HERE

Click the images for lager versions.

VHS VIDEO BASEMENT

VHS VIDEO BASEMENT are a group of like minded squatter souls who are in the process of screening an eternal film festival in many acts and in many locations across London, (they’ve been evicted and rehomed a few times now, they can currently be found behind the Odeon in Leicester Square), Alex Ressel and El Dunk have worked with Off Modern before, putting work into our first two exhibitions and magazines way back in 2008, as you know we recently celebrated our first year anniversary so its nice to our old comrades up to new things.

Click through to watch a selection of some of the work the VHS Video Basement have produced.

Alex Ressel presented us with their manifesto during our South East In East festival, here is a digital version of it.

If you long for more infomation about the VHS Video Basement please click here.

FIND ME

These posters are on display around various locations in New Cross as part of No Pain In Pop’s ‘Nail The Cross’ festival. Thanks to longtime collaborators Charlie Gibson for her Spaceman Collage and Patrick Barrett for his image of electricity lines at Bletchley Park.

ART MONTHLY: SPOTLIGHT ON CLAIRE BAILY

Claire Baily is one of our favourite young artists, she exhibited this movable, changeable and adaptable sculpture at our exhibition, FRONTIERS, back in May. Here are some nice pictures of it. If you want to follow what she is up to, she has just set up a blog, which is still looking a bit sparse, but keep an eye on it, good things are bound to follow.

- - -

A NEW CURIOSITY

We thought we should bring your attention to a new design/photography/art/interesting things blog run by Peckham based graphic designer and future tree surgeon Nicholas McQueen.

Ranging from Joseph W Kittinger’s worlds highest ever sky-dive to musings on the BBC shipping forecast, The Elastic Novice has plenty to keep you interested.

OM OM OM AUM


‘OMM’ by Fred Fuller

VIDEO WORK BY WARREN GARLAND

CLICK HERE TO VIEW

A PROPOSAL

By Suren Seneviratne

VINYL BOOTLEGGING

“In the spirit of this bold new age, Bradford Bahamas will be bootlegging vinyl for you LIVE THIS THURSDAY AT OFFMODERN!

Using their (patent pending & Top Secret) Bradfonic resin casting system they will be able to provide you with an appalling quality, but none the less playable, slab of resin vinyl taken from a mould made from whatever record you might choose to bring. Probably best not to bring anything to rare, the Bahamscopic process hasn’t damaged a source record yet, but you never know.”

It’ll take about 15 minutes. Enough time for you to play with their stuttering musical monitors and circuit bent toys

And here are some photos from their exhibiton at the Foundry.

Don’t bring anything too precious either, we can’t guarantee that it won’t break.

“I sometimes lose myself in me, I lose track of time”

[CLICK TO VIEW]

FREQUENCY//NAME//FORMAT

This is a piece that Charlesworth, Lewandowski and Mann did for us for our first exhibition/night in Novemeber; its a list of all the pirate radio stations in London, where you can find them and what style of music they play. If you came you probably got a copy of it as a poster or you might have seen it in the first issue of our zine. Dave Charleworth is going to be doing some more work for us soon, so keep an eye out for that.

For more work by Charleworth, Lewandowski and Mann you can click here.