Archives for posts tagged ‘existentialism’

AN EXISTENTIAL READING OF JIM CARREY’S THE MASK

Camus: If I try to seize this self of which I feel sure, if I try to define and to summarize it, it is nothing but water slipping through my fingers.


Dr. Arthur Neuman: We all wear masks . . . metaphorically speaking

Stanley Ipkiss: [on a bridge with Tina, holding the mask in his hand] You sure you’re not gonna miss this guy? Once he’s gone, all that’s left is me.



*

The Mask is a film that uses the symbolic power of the mask (a staple motif of theatre, dating as far back as the persona of the Greek tragedies and the make-up of Japanese kabuki theatre) to highlight the existential dilemmas faced by a nobody-deadbeat-loser, Stanley Ipkiss. Stanley is a bank clerk, he hates his boss, who bullies him incessantly, and he is unable to get with the object of his affection, Tina. It is when Stanley finds The Mask (somehow a magical trinket belonging to the Norse trickster god Loki has turned up in ‘Edge City’) that he is able to unleash his ‘real’ self upon the fantastical metropolis he inhabits.

This version of Stanley represents a transformation that foregrounds the uncontrollable element of the unconscious mind, allowing him to act out the desires that ordinary Stanley hasn’t the balls too, he courts and becomes romantically involved with Tina and tries to rid the city of its gangster problems. But the metamorphosis of the ordinary man into super hero poses us an existential question; what is the reality that lurks behind our conscious mind. Stanley must wear a mask to reveal his hidden self and so we can never be sure of whom the ‘real’ Stanley is. It is thus that Stanley loses sight of the real Stanley. His use of the mask allows him to conveniently disable the aspects of himself that he doesn’t like whilst uncovering the self that he wishes he were; the loud, brash, charming funny man. This is not the real Stanley Ipkiss though, and he is forced into confrontation between himself, the mask, his enemies and Tina, what we are left with is a Stanley who has undergone a rigorous existential crisis and has faced himself in order to uncover and learn about what reality and existence actually are.

EXISTENTIALISM WITH ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER

ACTOR: Judgment Day. The end of the world. It’s today, three hours from now.

ARNOLD: Two hours and 56 minutes. We must continue south into Mexico to escape the primary blast zones. The Mojave area will sustain significant nuclear fallout. You will not survive.

ACTOR: You mean we go hide somewhere in a hole while the bombs fall?

ARNOLD: It is your destiny.

ACTOR: Fuck my destiny. [actor puts a gun to his head]

ARNOLD: You cannot self-terminate.

ACTOR: No, you can’t. I can do whatever I want. I’m a human being. I’m not some goddamn robot. Either we get her father to shut Skynet down and stop this shit from ever happening, or so much for the great John Connor. Because your future, my destiny, I don’t want any part of it. I never did.

ARNOLD: Based on your pupil dilation, skin temperature and motor functions I calculate an 64% probability that you will not pull the trigger.

- - -

JEAN PAUL SARTRE: Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does. Life has no meaning a priori, it is up to you to give it a meaning, and value is nothing but the meaning that you choose.

- - -